If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.
The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument
A． fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neither
B． fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessful
C． equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial success
D． presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival
E． fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival